[PATCH] D28626: RFC: Generalize inverted gc dependencies

[Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-commits]

Robert Lytton <robert at xmos.com> writes:

> yes, sorry, I realised that on the way home!
> No, we don't - they are opaque.
> Please do refactor appropriately - thank you.

Awesome. Can you share how they are represented in the .o file? I may as
well change MC to represent them in the same way your assembler does.

Cheers,
Rafael