[PATCH] D28459: Make processing @llvm.assume more efficient - Add affected values to the assumption cache

[Davide Italiano via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

davide added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D28459#642235, @davide wrote:

> Sorry for the delay, Hal.
>  I just checked and this doesn't regress the cases your previous change regressed, so we should be good on that side.
>  I somehow share Dan's feeling that this could be solved with an infrastructural changes rather than caching, but I don't feel to be in a position to hinder progress without a concrete/implemented alternative.


For those wondering, I mean http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20170102/416193.html


https://reviews.llvm.org/D28459