[PATCH] D25478: Do not remove implicit defs in BranchFolder
Matthias Braun via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Oct 12 12:56:17 PDT 2016
MatzeB accepted this revision.
MatzeB added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D25478#568330, @kparzysz wrote:
> I looked at the actual differences:
>
> z23.s: one small block is located in a different place. It's not on a fall-through (either in or out) path in either case.
> z37.s: block numbering differences, no codegen differences
> z44.s: same as z37.s, i.e. no codegen differences
Sounds good to me.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25478
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list