[PATCH] D25478: Do not remove implicit defs in BranchFolder

[Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-commits]

kparzysz added a comment.

I looked at the actual differences:

z23.s: one small block is located in a different place.  It's not on a fall-through (either in or out) path in either case.
z37.s: block numbering differences, no codegen differences
z44.s: same as z37.s, i.e. no codegen differences


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D25478