[lld] r283787 - [LTO/Thin] Make the number of threads to run in the BE configurable.

[Rui Ueyama via llvm-commits]

I was thinking that gold has --lto-jobs option. Doesn't it? I'd think we
want to use the same command line option names as long as it makes sense so
that lld is a drop-in compatible with gold.

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Davide Italiano via llvm-commits <
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk>
> wrote:
> > We should expose this flag separately from the parallel LTO parallelism
> > level. See what we do in the gold plugin for example.
> >
> > Peter
> >
>
> Fair enough. Any suggestion on the name? From what I see gold uses
> --jobs but that's too similar to what we use already. Maybe
> --thinlto-jobs ?
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20161010/2977a5f1/attachment.html>