[lld] r273238 - Refactor X86_64TargetInfo::relaxTlsIeToLe.
Rui Ueyama via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 20 22:08:48 PDT 2016
Should be fixed in r273242. I'm sorry about the breakage.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
> On it.
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think this broke the bots:
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-ubuntu-fast/builds/15038/steps/build/logs/stdio
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-commits <
>> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Author: ruiu
>>> Date: Mon Jun 20 22:42:32 2016
>>> New Revision: 273238
>>>
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=273238&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Refactor X86_64TargetInfo::relaxTlsIeToLe.
>>>
>>> This patch is to rewrite the function with a table-lookup-ish approach
>>> so that it can read as a series of "convert this pattern to this"
>>> pattern.
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> lld/trunk/ELF/Target.cpp
>>> lld/trunk/test/ELF/tls-opt.s
>>>
>>> Modified: lld/trunk/ELF/Target.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lld/trunk/ELF/Target.cpp?rev=273238&r1=273237&r2=273238&view=diff
>>>
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- lld/trunk/ELF/Target.cpp (original)
>>> +++ lld/trunk/ELF/Target.cpp Mon Jun 20 22:42:32 2016
>>> @@ -677,34 +677,40 @@ void X86_64TargetInfo::relaxTlsGdToIe(ui
>>> // R_X86_64_TPOFF32 so that it does not use GOT.
>>> void X86_64TargetInfo::relaxTlsIeToLe(uint8_t *Loc, uint32_t Type,
>>> uint64_t Val) const {
>>> - // Ulrich's document section 6.5 says that @gottpoff(%rip) must be
>>> - // used in MOVQ or ADDQ instructions only.
>>> - // "MOVQ foo at GOTTPOFF(%RIP), %REG" is transformed to "MOVQ $foo,
>>> %REG".
>>> - // "ADDQ foo at GOTTPOFF(%RIP), %REG" is transformed to "LEAQ
>>> foo(%REG), %REG"
>>> - // (if the register is not RSP/R12) or "ADDQ $foo, %RSP".
>>> - // Opcodes info can be found at
>>> http://ref.x86asm.net/coder64.html#x48.
>>> - uint8_t *Prefix = Loc - 3;
>>> - uint8_t *Inst = Loc - 2;
>>> - uint8_t *RegSlot = Loc - 1;
>>> + uint8_t *Inst = Loc - 3;
>>> uint8_t Reg = Loc[-1] >> 3;
>>> - bool IsMov = *Inst == 0x8b;
>>> - bool RspAdd = !IsMov && Reg == 4;
>>> + uint8_t RegSlot = Loc - 1;
>>>
>>> - // r12 and rsp registers requires special handling.
>>> - // Problem is that for other registers, for example leaq
>>> 0xXXXXXXXX(%r11),%r11
>>> - // result out is 7 bytes: 4d 8d 9b XX XX XX XX,
>>> - // but leaq 0xXXXXXXXX(%r12),%r12 is 8 bytes: 4d 8d a4 24 XX XX XX XX.
>>> - // The same true for rsp. So we convert to addq for them, saving 1
>>> byte that
>>> - // we dont have.
>>> - if (RspAdd)
>>> - *Inst = 0x81;
>>> - else
>>> - *Inst = IsMov ? 0xc7 : 0x8d;
>>> - if (*Prefix == 0x4c)
>>> - *Prefix = (IsMov || RspAdd) ? 0x49 : 0x4d;
>>> - *RegSlot = (IsMov || RspAdd) ? (0xc0 | Reg) : (0x80 | Reg | (Reg <<
>>> 3));
>>> - // The original code used a pc relative relocation and so we have to
>>> - // compensate for the -4 in had in the addend.
>>> + // Note that LEA with RSP or R12 is converted to ADD instead of LEA
>>> + // because LEA with these registers needs 4 bytes to encode and thus
>>> + // wouldn't fit the space.
>>> +
>>> + if (memcmp(Inst, "\x48\x03\x25", 3) == 0) {
>>> + // "addq foo at gottpoff(%rip),%rsp" -> "addq $foo,%rsp"
>>> + memcpy(Inst, "\x48\x81\xc4", 3);
>>> + } else if (memcmp(Inst, "\x4c\x03\x25", 3) == 0) {
>>> + // "addq foo at gottpoff(%rip),%r12" -> "addq $foo,%r12"
>>> + memcpy(Inst, "\x49\x81\xc4", 3);
>>> + } else if (memcmp(Inst, "\x4c\x03", 2) == 0) {
>>> + // "addq foo at gottpoff(%rip),%r[8-15]" -> "leaq
>>> foo(%r[8-15]),%r[8-15]"
>>> + memcpy(Inst, "\x4d\x8d", 2);
>>> + *RegSlot = 0x80 | (Reg << 3) | Reg;
>>> + } else if (memcmp(Inst, "\x48\x03", 2) == 0) {
>>> + // "addq foo at gottpoff(%rip),%reg -> "leaq foo(%reg),%reg"
>>> + memcpy(Inst, "\x48\x8d", 2);
>>> + *RegSlot = 0x80 | (Reg << 3) | Reg;
>>> + } else if (memcmp(Inst, "\x4c\x8b", 2) == 0) {
>>> + // "movq foo at gottpoff(%rip),%r[8-15]" -> "movq $foo,%r[8-15]"
>>> + memcpy(Inst, "\x49\xc7", 2);
>>> + *RegSlot = 0xc0 | Reg;
>>> + } else if (memcmp(Inst, "\x48\x8b", 2) == 0) {
>>> + // "movq foo at gottpoff(%rip),%reg" -> "movq $foo,%reg"
>>> + memcpy(Inst, "\x48\xc7", 2);
>>> + *RegSlot = 0xc0 | Reg;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + // The original code used a PC relative relocation.
>>> + // Need to compensate for the -4 it had in the addend.
>>> relocateOne(Loc, R_X86_64_TPOFF32, Val + 4);
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> Modified: lld/trunk/test/ELF/tls-opt.s
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lld/trunk/test/ELF/tls-opt.s?rev=273238&r1=273237&r2=273238&view=diff
>>>
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- lld/trunk/test/ELF/tls-opt.s (original)
>>> +++ lld/trunk/test/ELF/tls-opt.s Mon Jun 20 22:42:32 2016
>>> @@ -20,11 +20,9 @@
>>> // DISASM-NEXT: 1103f: 4d 8d bf fc ff ff ff leaq -4(%r15), %r15
>>> // DISASM-NEXT: 11046: 48 81 c4 fc ff ff ff addq $-4, %rsp
>>> // DISASM-NEXT: 1104d: 49 81 c4 fc ff ff ff addq $-4, %r12
>>> -// Corrupred output:
>>> -// DISASM-NEXT: 11054: 48 8d 80 f8 ff ff ff leaq -8(%rax), %rax
>>> -// DISASM-NEXT: 1105b: 48 d1 81 c4 fc ff ff rolq -828(%rcx)
>>> -// DISASM-NEXT: 11062: ff 48 d1 decl -47(%rax)
>>> -// DISASM-NEXT: 11065: 81 c4 fc ff ff ff addl $4294967292, %esp
>>> +// DISASM-NEXT: 11054: 48 87 05 f8 ff ff ff xchgq %rax, -8(%rip)
>>> +// DISASM-NEXT: 1105b: 48 d1 24 25 fc ff ff ff shlq -4
>>> +// DISASM-NEXT: 11063: 48 d1 04 25 fc ff ff ff rolq -4
>>> // LD to LE:
>>> // DISASM-NEXT: 1106b: 66 66 66 64 48 8b 04 25 00 00 00 00 movq %fs:0,
>>> %rax
>>> // DISASM-NEXT: 11077: 48 8d 88 f8 ff ff ff leaq
>>> -8(%rax), %rcx
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20160621/88c6cd14/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list