[PATCH] D20258: IR: Introduce can_omit_from_dynsym attribute.

[David Majnemer via llvm-commits]

majnemer added a subscriber: majnemer.
majnemer added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20258#430070, @rafael wrote:

> As for naming, I would probably name it after what it checks, not what
>  it is currently used for.
>
> How about making the attribute be just "address_not_used_in_module"?
>  The other properties (like being linkonce_odr) are easy to check
>  without having to walk all uses.
>
> Should the verifier check if this the property is invalidly set?
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael


How about `unnamed_addr_in_module`?


http://reviews.llvm.org/D20258