[llvm] r268096 - [Docs] Add CMake Primer document

Chris Bieneman via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Apr 29 13:34:54 PDT 2016


Author: cbieneman
Date: Fri Apr 29 15:34:54 2016
New Revision: 268096

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=268096&view=rev
Log:
[Docs] Add CMake Primer document

This document is intended to provide a basic overview of the CMake scripting language for LLVM developers. It was unorthodoxly reviewed for accuracy and content on the CMake developer list:

http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake-developers/2016-April/028300.html

Added:
    llvm/trunk/docs/CMakePrimer.rst
Modified:
    llvm/trunk/docs/index.rst

Added: llvm/trunk/docs/CMakePrimer.rst
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/docs/CMakePrimer.rst?rev=268096&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/docs/CMakePrimer.rst (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/docs/CMakePrimer.rst Fri Apr 29 15:34:54 2016
@@ -0,0 +1,465 @@
+============
+CMake Primer
+============
+
+.. contents::
+   :local:
+
+.. warning::
+   Disclaimer: This documentation is written by LLVM project contributors `not`
+   anyone affiliated with the CMake project. This document may contain
+   inaccurate terminology, phrasing, or technical details. It is provided with
+   the best intentions.
+
+
+Introduction
+============
+
+The LLVM project and many of the core projects built on LLVM build using CMake.
+This document aims to provide a brief overview of CMake for developers modifying
+LLVM projects or building their own projects on top of LLVM.
+
+The official CMake language references is available in the cmake-language
+manpage and `cmake-language online documentation
+<https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.4/manual/cmake-language.7.html>`_.
+
+10,000 ft View
+==============
+
+CMake is a tool that reads script files in its own language that describe how a
+software project builds. As CMake evaluates the scripts it constructs an
+internal representation of the software project. Once the scripts have been
+fully processed, if there are no errors, CMake will generate build files to
+actually build the project. CMake supports generating build files for a variety
+of command line build tools as well as for popular IDEs.
+
+When a user runs CMake it performs a variety of checks similar to how autoconf
+worked historically. During the checks and the evaluation of the build
+description scripts CMake caches values into the CMakeCache. This is useful
+because it allows the build system to skip long-running checks during
+incremental development. CMake caching also has some drawbacks, but that will be
+discussed later.
+
+Scripting Overview
+==================
+
+CMake's scripting language has a very simple grammar. Every language construct
+is a command that matches the pattern _name_(_args_). Commands come in three
+primary types: language-defined (commands implemented in C++ in CMake), defined
+functions, and defined macros. The CMake distribution also contains a suite of
+CMake modules that contain definitions for useful functionality.
+
+The example below is the full CMake build for building a C++ "Hello World"
+program. The example uses only CMake language-defined functions.
+
+.. code-block:: cmake
+
+   cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.2)
+   project(HelloWorld)
+   add_executable(HelloWorld HelloWorld.cpp)
+
+The CMake language provides control flow constructs in the form of foreach loops
+and if blocks. To make the example above more complicated you could add an if
+block to define "APPLE" when targeting Apple platforms:
+
+.. code-block:: cmake
+
+   cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.2)
+   project(HelloWorld)
+   add_executable(HelloWorld HelloWorld.cpp)
+   if(APPLE)
+     target_compile_definitions(HelloWorld PUBLIC APPLE)
+   endif()
+   
+Variables, Types, and Scope
+===========================
+
+Dereferencing
+-------------
+
+In CMake variables are "stringly" typed. All variables are represented as
+strings throughout evaluation. Wrapping a variable in ``${}`` dereferences it
+and results in a literal substitution of the name for the value. CMake refers to
+this as "variable evaluation" in their documentation. Dereferences are performed
+*before* the command being called receives the arguments. This means
+dereferencing a list results in multiple separate arguments being passed to the
+command.
+
+Variable dereferences can be nested and be used to model complex data. For
+example:
+
+.. code-block:: cmake
+
+   set(var_name var1)
+   set(${var_name} foo) # same as "set(var1 foo)"
+   set(${${var_name}}_var bar) # same as "set(foo_var bar)"
+   
+Dereferencing an unset variable results in an empty expansion. It is a common
+pattern in CMake to conditionally set variables knowing that it will be used in
+code paths that the variable isn't set. There are examples of this throughout
+the LLVM CMake build system.
+
+An example of variable empty expansion is:
+
+.. code-block:: cmake
+
+   if(APPLE)
+     set(extra_sources Apple.cpp)
+   endif()
+   add_executable(HelloWorld HelloWorld.cpp ${extra_sources})
+   
+In this example the ``extra_sources`` variable is only defined if you're
+targeting an Apple platform. For all other targets the ``extra_sources`` will be
+evaluated as empty before add_executable is given its arguments.
+
+One big "Gotcha" with variable dereferencing is that ``if`` commands implicitly
+dereference values. This has some unexpected results. For example:
+
+.. code-block:: cmake
+
+   if("${SOME_VAR}" STREQUAL "MSVC")
+
+In this code sample MSVC will be implicitly dereferenced, which will result in
+the if command comparing the value of the dereferenced variables ``SOME_VAR``
+and ``MSVC``. A common workaround to this solution is to prepend strings being
+compared with an ``x``.
+
+.. code-block:: cmake
+
+   if("x${SOME_VAR}" STREQUAL "xMSVC")
+
+This works because while ``MSVC`` is a defined variable, ``xMSVC`` is not. This
+pattern is uncommon, but it does occur in LLVM's CMake scripts.
+
+.. note::
+   
+   Once the LLVM project upgrades its minimum CMake version to 3.1 or later we
+   can prevent this behavior by setting CMP0054 to new. For more information on
+   CMake policies please see the cmake-policies manpage or the `cmake-policies
+   online documentation
+   <https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.4/manual/cmake-policies.7.html>`_.
+
+Lists
+-----
+
+In CMake lists are semi-colon delimited strings, and it is strongly advised that
+you avoid using semi-colons in lists; it doesn't go smoothly. A few examples of
+defining lists:
+
+.. code-block:: cmake
+
+   # Creates a list with members a, b, c, and d
+   set(my_list a b c d)
+   set(my_list "a;b;c;d")
+   
+   # Creates a string "a b c d"
+   set(my_string "a b c d")
+
+Lists of Lists
+--------------
+
+One of the more complicated patterns in CMake is lists of lists. Because a list
+cannot contain an element with a semi-colon to construct a list of lists you
+make a list of variable names that refer to other lists. For example:
+
+.. code-block:: cmake
+
+   set(list_of_lists a b c)
+   set(a 1 2 3)
+   set(b 4 5 6)
+   set(c 7 8 9)
+   
+With this layout you can iterate through the list of lists printing each value
+with the following code:
+
+.. code-block:: cmake
+
+   foreach(list_name IN LISTS list_of_lists)
+     foreach(value IN LISTS ${list_name})
+       message(${value})
+     endforeach()
+   endforeach()
+   
+You'll notice that the inner foreach loop's list is doubly dereferenced. This is
+because the first dereference turns ``list_name`` into the name of the sub-list
+(a, b, or c in the example), then the second dereference is to get the value of
+the list.
+
+This pattern is used throughout CMake, the most common example is the compiler
+flags options, which CMake refers to using the following variable expansions:
+CMAKE_${LANGUAGE}_FLAGS and CMAKE_${LANGUAGE}_FLAGS_${CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE}.
+
+Other Types
+-----------
+
+Variables that are cached or specified on the command line can have types
+associated with them. The variable's type is used by CMake's UI tool to display
+the right input field. The variable's type generally doesn't impact evaluation.
+One of the few examples is PATH variables, which CMake does have some special
+handling for. You can read more about the special handling in `CMake's set
+documentation
+<https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.5/command/set.html#set-cache-entry>`_.
+
+Scope
+-----
+
+CMake inherently has a directory-based scoping. Setting a variable in a
+CMakeLists file, will set the variable for that file, and all subdirectories.
+Variables set in a CMake module that is included in a CMakeLists file will be
+set in the scope they are included from, and all subdirectories.
+
+When a variable that is already set is set again in a subdirectory it overrides
+the value in that scope and any deeper subdirectories.
+
+The CMake set command provides two scope-related options. PARENT_SCOPE sets a
+variable into the parent scope, and not the current scope. The CACHE option sets
+the variable in the CMakeCache, which results in it being set in all scopes. The
+CACHE option will not set a variable that already exists in the CACHE unless the
+FORCE option is specified.
+
+In addition to directory-based scope, CMake functions also have their own scope.
+This means variables set inside functions do not bleed into the parent scope.
+This is not true of macros, and it is for this reason LLVM prefers functions
+over macros whenever reasonable.
+
+.. note::
+  Unlike C-based languages, CMake's loop and control flow blocks do not have
+  their own scopes.
+
+Control Flow
+============
+
+CMake features the same basic control flow constructs you would expect in any
+scripting language, but there are a few quarks because, as with everything in
+CMake, control flow constructs are commands.
+
+If, ElseIf, Else
+----------------
+
+.. note::
+  For the full documentation on the CMake if command go
+  `here <https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.4/command/if.html>`_. That resource is
+  far more complete.
+
+In general CMake if blocks work the way you'd expect:
+
+.. code-block:: cmake
+
+  if(<condition>)
+    .. do stuff
+  elseif(<condition>)
+    .. do other stuff
+  else()
+    .. do other other stuff
+  endif()
+
+The single most important thing to know about CMake's if blocks coming from a C
+background is that they do not have their own scope. Variables set inside
+conditional blocks persist after the ``endif()``.
+
+Loops
+-----
+
+The most common form of the CMake ``foreach`` block is:
+
+.. code-block:: cmake
+
+  foreach(var ...)
+    .. do stuff
+  endforeach()
+
+The variable argument portion of the ``foreach`` block can contain dereferenced
+lists, values to iterate, or a mix of both:
+
+.. code-block:: cmake
+
+  foreach(var foo bar baz)
+    message(${var})
+  endforeach()
+  # prints:
+  #  foo
+  #  bar
+  #  baz
+
+  set(my_list 1 2 3)
+  foreach(var ${my_list})
+    message(${var})
+  endforeach()
+  # prints:
+  #  1
+  #  2
+  #  3
+
+  foreach(var ${my_list} out_of_bounds)
+    message(${var})
+  endforeach()
+  # prints:
+  #  1
+  #  2
+  #  3
+  #  out_of_bounds
+
+There is also a more modern CMake foreach syntax. The code below is equivalent
+to the code above:
+
+.. code-block:: cmake
+
+  foreach(var IN ITEMS foo bar baz)
+    message(${var})
+  endforeach()
+  # prints:
+  #  foo
+  #  bar
+  #  baz
+
+  set(my_list 1 2 3)
+  foreach(var IN LISTS my_list)
+    message(${var})
+  endforeach()
+  # prints:
+  #  1
+  #  2
+  #  3
+
+  foreach(var IN LISTS my_list ITEMS out_of_bounds)
+    message(${var})
+  endforeach()
+  # prints:
+  #  1
+  #  2
+  #  3
+  #  out_of_bounds
+
+Similar to the conditional statements, these generally behave how you would
+expect, and they do not have their own scope.
+
+CMake also supports ``while`` loops, although they are not widely used in LLVM.
+
+Modules, Functions and Macros
+=============================
+
+Modules
+-------
+
+Modules are CMake's vehicle for enabling code reuse. CMake modules are just
+CMake script files. They can contain code to execute on include as well as
+definitions for commands.
+
+In CMake macros and functions are universally referred to as commands, and they
+are the primary method of defining code that can be called multiple times.
+
+In LLVM we have several CMake modules that are included as part of our
+distribution for developers who don't build our project from source. Those
+modules are the fundamental pieces needed to build LLVM-based projects with
+CMake. We also rely on modules as a way of organizing the build system's
+functionality for maintainability and re-use within LLVM projects.
+
+Argument Handling
+-----------------
+
+When defining a CMake command handling arguments is very useful. The examples
+in this section will all use the CMake ``function`` block, but this all applies
+to the ``macro`` block as well.
+
+CMake commands can have named arguments, but all commands are implicitly
+variable argument. If the command has named arguments they are required and must
+be specified at every call site. Below is a trivial example of providing a
+wrapper function for CMake's built in function ``add_dependencies``.
+
+.. code-block:: cmake
+
+   function(add_deps target)
+     add_dependencies(${target} ${ARGV})
+   endfunction()
+
+This example defines a new macro named ``add_deps`` which takes a required first
+argument, and just calls another function passing through the first argument and
+all trailing arguments. When variable arguments are present CMake defines them
+in a list named ``ARGV``, and the count of the arguments is defined in ``ARGN``.
+
+CMake provides a module ``CMakeParseArguments`` which provides an implementation
+of advanced argument parsing. We use this all over LLVM, and it is recommended
+for any function that has complex argument-based behaviors or optional
+arguments. CMake's official documentation for the module is in the
+``cmake-modules`` manpage, and is also available at the
+`cmake-modules online documentation
+<https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.4/module/CMakeParseArguments.html>`_.
+
+.. note::
+  As of CMake 3.5 the cmake_parse_arguments command has become a native command
+  and the CMakeParseArguments module is empty and only left around for
+  compatibility.
+
+Functions Vs Macros
+-------------------
+
+Functions and Macros look very similar in how they are used, but there is one
+fundamental difference between the two. Functions have their own scope, and
+macros don't. This means variables set in macros will bleed out into the calling
+scope. That makes macros suitable for defining very small bits of functionality
+only.
+
+The other difference between CMake functions and macros is how arguments are
+passed. Arguments to macros are not set as variables, instead dereferences to
+the parameters are resolved across the macro before executing it. This can
+result in some unexpected behavior if using unreferenced variables. For example:
+
+.. code-block:: cmake
+
+   macro(print_list my_list)
+     foreach(var IN LISTS my_list)
+       message("${var}")
+     endforeach()
+   endmacro()
+   
+   set(my_list a b c d)
+   set(my_list_of_numbers 1 2 3 4)
+   print_list(my_list_of_numbers)
+   # prints:
+   # a
+   # b
+   # c
+   # d
+
+Generally speaking this issue is uncommon because it requires using
+non-dereferenced variables with names that overlap in the parent scope, but it
+is important to be aware of because it can lead to subtle bugs.
+
+LLVM Project Wrappers
+=====================
+
+LLVM projects provide lots of wrappers around critical CMake built-in commands.
+We use these wrappers to provide consistent behaviors across LLVM components
+and to reduce code duplication.
+
+We generally (but not always) follow the convention that commands prefaced with
+``llvm_`` are intended to be used only as building blocks for other commands.
+Wrapper commands that are intended for direct use are generally named following
+with the project in the middle of the command name (i.e. ``add_llvm_executable``
+is the wrapper for ``add_executable``). The LLVM ``add_*`` wrapper functions are
+all defined in ``AddLLVM.cmake`` which is installed as part of the LLVM
+distribution. It can be included and used by any LLVM sub-project that requires
+LLVM.
+
+.. note::
+
+   Not all LLVM projects require LLVM for all use cases. For example compiler-rt
+   can be built without LLVM, and the compiler-rt sanitizer libraries are used
+   with GCC.
+
+Useful Built-in Commands
+========================
+
+CMake has a bunch of useful built-in commands. This document isn't going to
+go into details about them because The CMake project has excellent
+documentation. To highlight a few useful functions see:
+
+* `add_custom_command <https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.4/command/add_custom_command.html>`_
+* `add_custom_target <https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.4/command/add_custom_target.html>`_
+* `file <https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.4/command/file.html>`_
+* `list <https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.4/command/list.html>`_
+* `math <https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.4/command/math.html>`_
+* `string <https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.4/command/string.html>`_
+
+The full documentation for CMake commands is in the ``cmake-commands`` manpage
+and available on `CMake's website <https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.4/manual/cmake-commands.7.html>`_

Modified: llvm/trunk/docs/index.rst
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/docs/index.rst?rev=268096&r1=268095&r2=268096&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/docs/index.rst (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/docs/index.rst Fri Apr 29 15:34:54 2016
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ representation.
    :hidden:
 
    CMake
+   CMakePrimer
    AdvancedBuilds
    HowToBuildOnARM
    HowToCrossCompileLLVM




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list