[PATCH] D17918: [ELF] - Issue an error if trying to generate relocatable from objects having mixed splitstacks.
Filipe Cabecinhas via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Mar 7 01:33:11 PST 2016
filcab added a subscriber: filcab.
filcab added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D17918#368701, @grimar wrote:
> > You want to also keep ".note.GNU-no-split-stack", no?
>
>
>
>
> > Thank you,
>
> >
>
> > Filipe
>
>
> I think I got what you mean, I am not proccessing the ".note.GNU-no-split-stack" at all. So it should not be discarded now then anyways.
>
> George.
It should still get the same type of handling as GNU-split-stack, though. I see no reason to handle one (even if "handle" is discarding if the output is not relocatable) but not the other.
But I think the latter messages have a better idea: Simply rejecting split-stack objects (unless you plan on adding the rest of the support, including changing function prologues) seems like the most appropriate thing to do right now.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17918
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list