[PATCH] D17891: [sanitizer] Fix strlen assumptions in sanitizer interception code

[Kostya Serebryany via llvm-commits]

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Derek Bruening <bruening at google.com> wrote:

> bruening added a comment.
>
> What if instead we moved the strlen interceptors that are currently
> private to asan, tsan, and msan into the set of common interceptors, thus
> ensuring that REAL(strlen) exists (as well as unifying the currently
> duplicate interceptors)?  I actually already have a local CL that moves
> strlen and strchr* into the common set which I can send for review.
>
In most cases such unification is more than welcome!
(Just need to be careful not to lose any functionality)

>
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D17891
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20160304/ae420f94/attachment.html>