[PATCH] D12843: [Polly] Merge IRAccess into MemoryAccess

[Mailing List "llvm-commits" via llvm-commits]

llvm-commits added a comment.

> but their order might be different now.


I always believed the order of (non-scalar) memory accesses in the SCoP
statement corresponded to the order of memory instructions in the basic
block. Was this true would not be anymore? If so I would like to keep the
old order if possible. If it wasn't true before, this comment is void.

- F831006: msg-2753-16.dat <http://reviews.llvm.org/F831006>
- F831005: msg-2753-17.txt <http://reviews.llvm.org/F831005>


http://reviews.llvm.org/D12843