[PATCH] D12843: [Polly] Merge IRAccess into MemoryAccess

[Johannes Doerfert via llvm-commits]

> but their order might be different now.
I always believed the order of (non-scalar) memory accesses in the SCoP
statement corresponded to the order of memory instructions in the basic
block. Was this true would not be anymore? If so I would like to keep the
old order if possible. If it wasn't true before, this comment is void.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150914/171f7809/attachment.sig>