[PATCH] D12318: [ASan] Enable optional ASan recovery

[Yury Gribov via llvm-commits]

ygribov added a comment.

> One more interesting question that came to my mind: is this going to be async-signal-safe?

>  If not, the whole idea is kind of questionable.


I don't see why it shouldn't - the only problematic place is acquiring the mutex which will either wait (in case reporting_tid is different from current_tid) or fail with informative message after timeout.

> If you think it will, please add tests.


I could generate errors in endless loop in a thread and bombard it with signals but that's probably not very reliable.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

http://reviews.llvm.org/D12318