[patch] Start fixing pr24429

[Dan Gohman via llvm-commits]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Rafael Espíndola
<rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12 August 2015 at 10:55, Dan Gohman <dan433584 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't understand the vision for triples well enough to properly
>> review this. Is there an eventual boundary for the information that
>> should be sourced from a triple? I read the recent "trouble with
>> triples" thread but am still not fully clear on where things are
>> headed.
>
> I am not sure, but note that this patch doesn't add any new
> information to the triple. I just uses what is already there.

It does remove information from MCObjectFileInfo though. Is it really
desirable to pick the Triple to be the one that gets to keep this
information, rather than the other way around? I don't have a clear
view of where this is headed.

Dan