[patch] Start fixing pr24429

[Rafael Espíndola via llvm-commits]

On 12 August 2015 at 10:55, Dan Gohman <dan433584 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't understand the vision for triples well enough to properly
> review this. Is there an eventual boundary for the information that
> should be sourced from a triple? I read the recent "trouble with
> triples" thread but am still not fully clear on where things are
> headed.

I am not sure, but note that this patch doesn't add any new
information to the triple. I just uses what is already there.

Cheers,
Rafael