[PATCH] Add a 'no-asserts' requirement option to LIT.

[Chandler Carruth]

I don't understand the requested change...

We already have the ability to say 'REQUIRES: asserts' when checking things only enabled in asserts builds.

It sounds like you want to check for things only enabled in *no-*asserts builds? I'm surprised any such things exist. My inclination is to say "we shouldn't have no-asserts emit data that we don't emit in asserts".


REPOSITORY
  rL LLVM

http://reviews.llvm.org/D7383

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/