[PATCH] LLD: Inherit constructors. No functionality change.
David Blaikie
dblaikie at gmail.com
Wed Mar 25 13:36:10 PDT 2015
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
> Yup, I'd like to hear from more audiences about their opinions.
>
We already have a few instances of perfect forwarding in LLVm - mostly in
more core libraries than this, but I don't think it's too interesting.
Especially in this really basic/common/cliched case - there's nothing else
here to make it particularly confusing, it's just the classic application
of variadic templates/perfect forwarding.
(but yeah - I'm hardly the best test subject for this, so more opinions are
certainly valuable)
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Simon Atanasyan <simon at atanasyan.com>
> wrote:
>
>> As to me the patch looks good. The code becomes much shorter. But I do
>> not think that `std::forward` is a common idiom for constructor
>> inheritance. Might it confuse somebody?
>>
>>
>> REPOSITORY
>> rL LLVM
>>
>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D8616
>>
>> EMAIL PREFERENCES
>> http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150325/2b1fdf52/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list