[polly] r212080 - [FIX] Don't consider reductions which are partially outside the SCoP
Tobias Grosser
tobias at grosser.es
Wed Jul 2 12:06:09 PDT 2014
On 02/07/2014 20:46, Johannes Doerfert wrote:
> Just out of curiosity:
> Is there a plan to remove independent blocks in the future?
> I was under the impression we will hold on to that part and not migrate to
> SSA-variable dependences.
Yes, I would like to make ScopInfo produce results without any
modifications to the IR. This is in the light of enabling Polly by
default where we only want to modify the IR if we actually performed
some useful changes both to not accidentally introduce performance
regressions in the generated code and also to not invalidate any
analysis passes. -polly-codegen-scev is a step into this direction.
The goal is not per-SSA-variable dependences, but to do the very same
thing as today, but to only introduce the one-element arrays
conceptually but only materialize them at AST generation time.
Cheers,
Tobias
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list