[polly] r212080 - [FIX] Don't consider reductions which are partially outside the SCoP
Johannes Doerfert
jdoerfert at codeaurora.org
Wed Jul 2 11:46:41 PDT 2014
Just out of curiosity:
Is there a plan to remove independent blocks in the future?
I was under the impression we will hold on to that part and not migrate to
SSA-variable dependences.
--
Johannes Doerfert
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by
The Linux Foundation
-----Original Message-----
From: Tobias Grosser [mailto:tobias at grosser.es]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 11:02 AM
To: Johannes Doerfert; llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [polly] r212080 - [FIX] Don't consider reductions which are
partially outside the SCoP
On 02/07/2014 20:00, Johannes Doerfert wrote:
> I was thinking:
> Basic blocks unequal + Independent blocks => outside the SCoP
>
> But I might be wrong and I can most certainly adjust the comment if
> you want me to (but only next week, sorry!).
This is a little indirect and may not hold in case we remove the independent
blocks in the future. Please do so.
Tobias
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list