[PATCH] Add optimization remarks to the loop unroller and vectorizer.

[Nadav Rotem]

On Apr 22, 2014, at 2:04 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, excellent.  There is ongoing discussion on cfg-list about the proper name for ‘unroll’, but when we make a decision we can rename the remark and some variables in the code. 
> 
> Not sure what cfg-list is, but this is easy enough to change at anytime.

Typo. I meant CFE.  http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/ 

>  
> I would also like to report places where we fail to vectorize but we can do it later on. 
> 
> Yeah, but for that we want to use the negated form of -Rpass (maybe -Rmiss), which I still have not implemented.

Sounds good. Thanks. 

> 
>  
> Thanks. Diego.
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140422/2c58f95c/attachment.html>