[LLVMdev] 3.4.1 Release Plans

Renato Golin renato.golin at linaro.org
Thu Apr 3 01:42:40 PDT 2014


On 3 April 2014 08:51, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:

> It looks like this could be raised to 100% by restoring the prior order of
> the llvm::Intrinsic enum?
>

Do we want to go that far?

I'm not against it, I've done this before, but I'm just making sure we know
what we're getting into.

If we keep the order in trunk, we'll have created a rule of which enum
orders can't be changed (which messes up the code), if we change the stable
branch only, we'll make it harder to backport and create further dot
releases.

By all means, now is the time to experiment (on stable branches), so if you
want the latter, I won't oppose, but the former will face public opposition
right and left, I predict.

cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140403/4bb72d43/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list