[compiler-rt] r196480 - [sanitizer] support toolchains that don't understand CFI directives
Kostya Serebryany
kcc at google.com
Thu Dec 5 10:41:01 PST 2013
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Rafael EspĂndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com
> wrote:
> > +#if defined(__clang__) ||
> \
> > + (defined(__GNUC__) && defined(__GCC_HAVE_DWARF2_CFI_ASM))
> > + // GCC defined __GCC_HAVE_DWARF2_CFI_ASM if it supports CFI.
>
> Should we change clang to define __GCC_HAVE_DWARF2_CFI_ASM too?
>
Dunno. If we want to support old toolchains that don't understand .cfi --
maybe yes.
For me this is not important.
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20131205/08b2ea65/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list