[compiler-rt] r196480 - [sanitizer] support toolchains that don't understand CFI directives

Kostya Serebryany kcc at google.com
Thu Dec 5 10:41:01 PST 2013


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Rafael EspĂ­ndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com
> wrote:

> > +#if defined(__clang__) ||
>        \
> > +    (defined(__GNUC__) && defined(__GCC_HAVE_DWARF2_CFI_ASM))
> > +  // GCC defined __GCC_HAVE_DWARF2_CFI_ASM if it supports CFI.
>
> Should we change clang to define  __GCC_HAVE_DWARF2_CFI_ASM too?
>

Dunno. If we want to support old toolchains that don't understand .cfi --
maybe yes.
For me this is not important.


>
> Cheers,
> Rafael
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20131205/08b2ea65/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list