<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Rafael Espíndola <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rafael.espindola@gmail.com" target="_blank">rafael.espindola@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">> +#if defined(__clang__) ||                                                      \<br>
> +    (defined(__GNUC__) && defined(__GCC_HAVE_DWARF2_CFI_ASM))<br>
> +  // GCC defined __GCC_HAVE_DWARF2_CFI_ASM if it supports CFI.<br>
<br>
</div>Should we change clang to define  __GCC_HAVE_DWARF2_CFI_ASM too?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Dunno. If we want to support old toolchains that don't understand .cfi -- maybe yes.</div><div>For me this is not important. </div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Rafael<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>