[PATCH] Document tagging of untagged member functions in /include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h

[Bill Wendling]

That would be good, since you're there and all. :-)

-bw

On Oct 29, 2013, at 9:27 AM, MathOnNapkins . <mathonnapkins at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Bill,
> 
> As I was mostly intending this to be a janitorial sort of edit so that doxygen would actually pick it up in the first place, I hadn't put much thought into adding brief descriptions for routines in the patch. If you think it would be prudent I can try to adjust the patch to add (or partition off) brief descriptions.
> 
> Thanks,
> ~MoN / Dave
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote:
> Should you also put a "\brief" at the beginning?
> 
> -bw
> 
> On Oct 29, 2013, at 8:53 AM, MathOnNapkins . <mathonnapkins at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Dear All,
> >
> > This is a small patch to convert normal comments in this file to document comments (// -> ///), as the descriptions for some of the routines were not being shown in the doxygen help.
> >
> > Note: I am resubmitting this patch from a previous email, and the body of this email is a repeat. I am not trying to be a nuisance. I am only resubmitting because I noticed my previous email lacked a [PATCH] tag in the subject line, and it's my assumption that it was ignored or overlooked because of this. Please inform me if there is a protocol or etiquette I should further follow. I don't have commit access.
> >
> > Thanks for your time,
> > ~MoN / Dave
> > <target_lowering_doc_tag_missing_virtuals.patch>_______________________________________________
> > llvm-commits mailing list
> > llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20131029/9a891ba8/attachment.html>