[PATCH] Add llvm.x86.* intrinsics for Intel SHA Extensions

[Jordan Rose]

Yeah, I don't know either. Sorry for the noise.

Jordan

On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:24 , Langmuir, Ben <ben.langmuir at intel.com> wrote:

> The next build passed, so I'm not sure what went wrong.
> 
> Ben
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvm-commits-
>> bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Langmuir, Ben
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 1:05 PM
>> To: reviews+D1689+public+d3601369688d92b1 at llvm-
>> reviews.chandlerc.com; craig.topper at gmail.com; jordan_rose at apple.com
>> Cc: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Add llvm.x86.* intrinsics for Intel SHA Extensions
>> 
>> I'm waiting for the next build (http://lab.llvm.org:8013/builders/clang-
>> x86_64-darwin11-DA/builds/4876) to see if this is still broken. I cannot
>> explain how my change would affect this opt test, and I cannot reproduce
>> the failure on the mac I have access to.  If the next run fails too I can revert...
>> 
>> Ben
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jordan Rose [mailto:]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 12:51 PM
>>> To: craig.topper at gmail.com; Langmuir, Ben
>>> Cc: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; nrotem at apple.com;
>> jordan_rose at apple.com
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add llvm.x86.* intrinsics for Intel SHA
>>> Extensions
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  This seems to have broken the x86_64 phased builder. Can you take a
>> look?
>>> (Sorry I can't get you the output right now.)
>>> 
>>>  http://lab.llvm.org:8013/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin11-DA
>>> 
>>> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1689
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits