[PATCH] Add llvm.x86.* intrinsics for Intel SHA Extensions

[Langmuir, Ben]

The next build passed, so I'm not sure what went wrong.

Ben

> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvm-commits-
> bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Langmuir, Ben
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 1:05 PM
> To: reviews+D1689+public+d3601369688d92b1 at llvm-
> reviews.chandlerc.com; craig.topper at gmail.com; jordan_rose at apple.com
> Cc: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Add llvm.x86.* intrinsics for Intel SHA Extensions
> 
> I'm waiting for the next build (http://lab.llvm.org:8013/builders/clang-
> x86_64-darwin11-DA/builds/4876) to see if this is still broken. I cannot
> explain how my change would affect this opt test, and I cannot reproduce
> the failure on the mac I have access to.  If the next run fails too I can revert...
> 
> Ben
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jordan Rose [mailto:]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 12:51 PM
> > To: craig.topper at gmail.com; Langmuir, Ben
> > Cc: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; nrotem at apple.com;
> jordan_rose at apple.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add llvm.x86.* intrinsics for Intel SHA
> > Extensions
> >
> >
> >   This seems to have broken the x86_64 phased builder. Can you take a
> look?
> > (Sorry I can't get you the output right now.)
> >
> >   http://lab.llvm.org:8013/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin11-DA
> >
> > http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1689
> 
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits