[llvm] r176022 - Fix the root cause of PR15348 by correctly handling alignment 0 on

[Chandler Carruth]

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey,
>
> I don't know either - I was quoting your analysis from the commit message.
> ;)
>
> To be clear - I wasn't proposing a change to the definition of the IR,
> though that has crossed on my mind too. I'm saying that I think the DAGs
> actually rely on the alignment being non-zero.
>

Ah, the alignment in the DAG node? Yea, because '0' has a different special
meaning in some of the APIs, right? So, if the asserts are before the
special meaning kicks in, sounds good.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20130328/39389337/attachment.html>