[llvm] r177296 - Fix 80-col. violations in PPCCTRLoops
Hal Finkel
hfinkel at anl.gov
Mon Mar 18 10:40:46 PDT 2013
Author: hfinkel
Date: Mon Mar 18 12:40:46 2013
New Revision: 177296
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=177296&view=rev
Log:
Fix 80-col. violations in PPCCTRLoops
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCCTRLoops.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCCTRLoops.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCCTRLoops.cpp?rev=177296&r1=177295&r2=177296&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCCTRLoops.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCCTRLoops.cpp Mon Mar 18 12:40:46 2013
@@ -425,7 +425,8 @@ CountValue *PPCCTRLoops::getTripCount(Ma
DefInstr->getOpcode() == PPC::LI)) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << " initial constant: " << *DefInstr);
- int64_t count = ImmVal - int64_t(short(DefInstr->getOperand(1).getImm()));
+ int64_t count = ImmVal -
+ int64_t(short(DefInstr->getOperand(1).getImm()));
if ((count % iv_value) != 0) {
return 0;
}
@@ -443,8 +444,8 @@ CountValue *PPCCTRLoops::getTripCount(Ma
}
// FIXME: handle non-zero end value.
}
- // FIXME: handle non-unit increments (we might not want to introduce division
- // but we can handle some 2^n cases with shifts).
+ // FIXME: handle non-unit increments (we might not want to introduce
+ // division but we can handle some 2^n cases with shifts).
}
}
@@ -515,9 +516,10 @@ bool PPCCTRLoops::isDead(const MachineIn
if (MO.isReg() && MO.isDef()) {
unsigned Reg = MO.getReg();
if (!MRI->use_nodbg_empty(Reg)) {
- // This instruction has users, but if the only user is the phi node for the
- // parent block, and the only use of that phi node is this instruction, then
- // this instruction is dead: both it (and the phi node) can be removed.
+ // This instruction has users, but if the only user is the phi node for
+ // the parent block, and the only use of that phi node is this
+ // instruction, then this instruction is dead: both it (and the phi
+ // node) can be removed.
MachineRegisterInfo::use_iterator I = MRI->use_begin(Reg);
if (llvm::next(I) == MRI->use_end() &&
I.getOperand().getParent()->isPHI()) {
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list