[llvm-commits] [PATCH] Review request: Test case for indirect argument with X86FastISel

Evan Cheng evan.cheng at apple.com
Mon Aug 6 13:05:55 PDT 2012


The RUN line doesn't specify target arch or triple. That's going to break some buildbots. Also, please significantly reduce the test to include only the functionality it is intended to test. Right now it includes main() and other parts that are not needed. You also don't have patterns that tell us what it is you are testing.

Evan

On Aug 3, 2012, at 10:20 AM, "Kaylor, Andrew" <andrew.kaylor at intel.com> wrote:

> Ping.
>  
> From: llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Kaylor, Andrew
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 1:12 PM
> To: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Test case for indirect argument with X86FastISel
>  
> Hi everyone,
>  
> The attached patch adds an X86 CodeGen test for the case where an indirect argument is used while FastISel was enabled.  This is the test case for a patch I previously posted here:
>  
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120709/146224.html
>  
> which was committed in r16055.
>  
> I’ve only seen the indirect argument being generated on Windows, but the test will pass on other platforms without the indirect argument being generated.
>  
> -Andy
>  
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20120806/a05383ae/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list