[llvm-commits] [patch][lto] Use MC to scan for symbol definitions and uses

[Rafael Ávila de Espíndola]

On 11-02-26 6:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
> Very nice!
>
> Patch looks quite reasonable to me, my only concern would be whether
> it should wait for after 2.9 branch. It's probably safe, but it might
> be better to take it afterwards in case it needs to bake.
>
> Are you aware of situations the current code handles that this one doesn't?

No, but it is possible that some users have dependency on the old 
behavior. For example, we now require that assembly being passed by 
libLTO be valid.

With the git mirrors in place it should not be a big problem to help the 
patch for 10 days :-)

>   - Daniel
>

Cheers,
Rafael