[llvm-commits] [PATCH] Dump with LI Indices
David Greene
dag at cray.com
Wed Aug 5 13:20:40 PDT 2009
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 23:07, Chris Lattner wrote:
> The idea is that we shouldn't have to affect every instance of "dump
> ()", just add a new DumpWithLiveIntervals() function, and call that
> instead. There is no reason to have "magic" to make "dump()" itself
> add extra info.
I still don't understand how this is better. Wouldn't DumpWithLiveIntervals()
have to duplicate all of the functionality of dump()?
-Dave
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list