[llvm-commits] [PATCH] Dump with LI Indices
    David Greene 
    dag at cray.com
       
    Wed Aug  5 13:20:40 PDT 2009
    
    
  
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 23:07, Chris Lattner wrote:
> The idea is that we shouldn't have to affect every instance of "dump
> ()", just add a new DumpWithLiveIntervals() function, and call that
> instead.  There is no reason to have "magic" to make "dump()" itself
> add extra info.
I still don't understand how this is better.  Wouldn't DumpWithLiveIntervals()
have to duplicate all of the functionality of dump()?
                            -Dave
    
    
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list