[llvm-commits] [llvm] r63940 - /llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Target/TargetRegisterInfo.h

[Dan Gohman]

Wouldn't it be better to make it a pure virtual member function?

Dan

On Feb 6, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote:

> Author: evancheng
> Date: Fri Feb  6 11:51:34 2009
> New Revision: 63940
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=63940&view=rev
> Log:
> We don't really need the abort here. This unbreak x86_64 linux build.
>
> Modified:
>    llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Target/TargetRegisterInfo.h
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Target/TargetRegisterInfo.h
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Target/TargetRegisterInfo.h?rev=63940&r1=63939&r2=63940&view=diff
>
> ===
> ===
> ===
> =====================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Target/TargetRegisterInfo.h (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Target/TargetRegisterInfo.h Fri Feb  6  
> 11:51:34 2009
> @@ -426,7 +426,6 @@
>   /// values.
>   virtual const TargetRegisterClass *getPointerRegClass() const {
>     assert(0 && "Target didn't implement getPointerRegClass!");
> -    abort();
>     return 0; // Must return a value in order to compile with VS 2005
>   }
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits