[llvm-commits] [llvm] r47862 - /llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MachineInstr.cpp

[Bill Wendling]

I meant it in the general case. From what I could gather, the operands
are kept in at least two different lists. Anyway, no biggie.

-bw

On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote:
> Except it's not using an iterator...
>
>  Evan
>
>
>
>  On Mar 3, 2008, at 3:51 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>
>  > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com>
>  > wrote:
>  >> Haven't you heard goto's are evil? :-)
>  >>
>  >> I think goto's can be used tastefully. However, it's definitely not
>  >> the right situation to use it in this case.
>  >>
>  > Fair enough. I was 90% sure that that was going to be picked on when I
>  > submitted it. I did it that way because how the machine operands are
>  > stored in the machine instruction is non-intuitive and I didn't want
>  > to make a mistake of having an invalid iterator. :-)
>  >
>  > -bw
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
>  > llvm-commits mailing list
>  > llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>  > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  llvm-commits mailing list
>  llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>  http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>