[llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelPattern.cpp
Chris Lattner
lattner at cs.uiuc.edu
Thu Jan 20 08:50:32 PST 2005
Changes in directory llvm/lib/Target/X86:
X86ISelPattern.cpp updated: 1.81 -> 1.82
---
Log message:
Fix a crash compiling 134.perl.
---
Diffs of the changes: (+41 -21)
Index: llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelPattern.cpp
diff -u llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelPattern.cpp:1.81 llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelPattern.cpp:1.82
--- llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelPattern.cpp:1.81 Wed Jan 19 11:24:34 2005
+++ llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelPattern.cpp Thu Jan 20 10:50:16 2005
@@ -490,6 +490,27 @@
return Result;
}
+/// NodeTransitivelyUsesValue - Return true if N or any of its uses uses Op.
+/// The DAG cannot have cycles in it, by definition, so the visited set is not
+/// needed to prevent infinite loops. The DAG CAN, however, have unbounded
+/// reuse, so it prevents exponential cases.
+///
+static bool NodeTransitivelyUsesValue(SDOperand N, SDOperand Op,
+ std::set<SDNode*> &Visited) {
+ if (N == Op) return true; // Found it.
+ SDNode *Node = N.Val;
+ if (Node->getNumOperands() == 0) return false; // Leaf?
+ if (!Visited.insert(Node).second) return false; // Already visited?
+
+ // Recurse for the first N-1 operands.
+ for (unsigned i = 1, e = Node->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i)
+ if (NodeTransitivelyUsesValue(Node->getOperand(i), Op, Visited))
+ return true;
+
+ // Tail recurse for the last operand.
+ return NodeTransitivelyUsesValue(Node->getOperand(0), Op, Visited);
+}
+
X86AddressMode ISel::SelectAddrExprs(const X86ISelAddressMode &IAM) {
X86AddressMode Result;
@@ -497,13 +518,33 @@
// register pressure first.
if (IAM.BaseType == X86ISelAddressMode::RegBase &&
IAM.Base.Reg.Val && IAM.IndexReg.Val) {
+ bool EmitBaseThenIndex;
if (getRegPressure(IAM.Base.Reg) > getRegPressure(IAM.IndexReg)) {
+ std::set<SDNode*> Visited;
+ EmitBaseThenIndex = true;
+ // If Base ends up pointing to Index, we must emit index first. This is
+ // because of the way we fold loads, we may end up doing bad things with
+ // the folded add.
+ if (NodeTransitivelyUsesValue(IAM.Base.Reg, IAM.IndexReg, Visited))
+ EmitBaseThenIndex = false;
+ } else {
+ std::set<SDNode*> Visited;
+ EmitBaseThenIndex = false;
+ // If Base ends up pointing to Index, we must emit index first. This is
+ // because of the way we fold loads, we may end up doing bad things with
+ // the folded add.
+ if (NodeTransitivelyUsesValue(IAM.IndexReg, IAM.Base.Reg, Visited))
+ EmitBaseThenIndex = true;
+ }
+
+ if (EmitBaseThenIndex) {
Result.Base.Reg = SelectExpr(IAM.Base.Reg);
Result.IndexReg = SelectExpr(IAM.IndexReg);
} else {
Result.IndexReg = SelectExpr(IAM.IndexReg);
Result.Base.Reg = SelectExpr(IAM.Base.Reg);
}
+
} else if (IAM.BaseType == X86ISelAddressMode::RegBase && IAM.Base.Reg.Val) {
Result.Base.Reg = SelectExpr(IAM.Base.Reg);
} else if (IAM.IndexReg.Val) {
@@ -1070,27 +1111,6 @@
BuildMI(BB, Opc, 2).addReg(Tmp1).addReg(Tmp2);
}
-/// NodeTransitivelyUsesValue - Return true if N or any of its uses uses Op.
-/// The DAG cannot have cycles in it, by definition, so the visited set is not
-/// needed to prevent infinite loops. The DAG CAN, however, have unbounded
-/// reuse, so it prevents exponential cases.
-///
-static bool NodeTransitivelyUsesValue(SDOperand N, SDOperand Op,
- std::set<SDNode*> &Visited) {
- if (N == Op) return true; // Found it.
- SDNode *Node = N.Val;
- if (Node->getNumOperands() == 0) return false; // Leaf?
- if (!Visited.insert(Node).second) return false; // Already visited?
-
- // Recurse for the first N-1 operands.
- for (unsigned i = 1, e = Node->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i)
- if (NodeTransitivelyUsesValue(Node->getOperand(i), Op, Visited))
- return true;
-
- // Tail recurse for the last operand.
- return NodeTransitivelyUsesValue(Node->getOperand(0), Op, Visited);
-}
-
/// isFoldableLoad - Return true if this is a load instruction that can safely
/// be folded into an operation that uses it.
bool ISel::isFoldableLoad(SDOperand Op, SDOperand OtherOp) {
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list