[llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/lib/Target/X86/Printer.cpp
Chris Lattner
lattner at cs.uiuc.edu
Mon Nov 18 00:58:01 PST 2002
Changes in directory llvm/lib/Target/X86:
Printer.cpp updated: 1.6 -> 1.7
---
Log message:
Start trying to print instructions more correctly. For now we also print out the opcode for each instruction as well.
---
Diffs of the changes:
Index: llvm/lib/Target/X86/Printer.cpp
diff -u llvm/lib/Target/X86/Printer.cpp:1.6 llvm/lib/Target/X86/Printer.cpp:1.7
--- llvm/lib/Target/X86/Printer.cpp:1.6 Sun Nov 17 17:20:37 2002
+++ llvm/lib/Target/X86/Printer.cpp Mon Nov 18 00:56:51 2002
@@ -67,10 +67,99 @@
return false;
}
+static void printOp(std::ostream &O, const MachineOperand &MO,
+ const MRegisterInfo &RI) {
+ switch (MO.getType()) {
+ case MachineOperand::MO_VirtualRegister:
+ if (MO.getReg() < MRegisterInfo::FirstVirtualRegister)
+ O << RI.get(MO.getReg()).Name;
+ else
+ O << "%reg" << MO.getReg();
+ return;
+
+ default:
+ O << "<unknown op ty>"; return;
+ }
+}
+
+static inline void toHexDigit(std::ostream &O, unsigned char V) {
+ if (V >= 10)
+ O << (char)('A'+V-10);
+ else
+ O << (char)('0'+V);
+}
+
+static std::ostream &toHex(std::ostream &O, unsigned char V) {
+ toHexDigit(O, V >> 4);
+ toHexDigit(O, V & 0xF);
+ return O;
+}
+
// print - Print out an x86 instruction in intel syntax
void X86InstrInfo::print(const MachineInstr *MI, std::ostream &O,
const TargetMachine &TM) const {
- // FIXME: This sucks.
- O << getName(MI->getOpCode()) << "\n";
+ unsigned Opcode = MI->getOpcode();
+ const MachineInstrDescriptor &Desc = get(Opcode);
+
+ if (Desc.TSFlags & X86II::TB)
+ O << "0F ";
+
+ switch (Desc.TSFlags & X86II::FormMask) {
+ case X86II::OtherFrm:
+ O << "\t";
+ O << "-"; MI->print(O, TM);
+ break;
+ case X86II::RawFrm:
+ toHex(O, getBaseOpcodeFor(Opcode)) << "\t";
+ O << getName(MI->getOpCode()) << " ";
+
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = MI->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
+ if (i) O << ", ";
+ printOp(O, MI->getOperand(i), RI);
+ }
+ O << "\n";
+ return;
+
+
+ case X86II::AddRegFrm:
+ O << "\t-"; MI->print(O, TM); break;
+
+ case X86II::MRMDestReg:
+ // There are two acceptable forms of MRMDestReg instructions, those with 3
+ // and 2 operands:
+ //
+ // 3 Operands: in this form, the first two registers (the destination, and
+ // the first operand) should be the same, post register allocation. The 3rd
+ // operand is an additional input. This should be for things like add
+ // instructions.
+ //
+ // 2 Operands: this is for things like mov that do not read a second input
+ //
+ assert(((MI->getNumOperands() == 3 &&
+ (MI->getOperand(0).getType()==MachineOperand::MO_VirtualRegister&&
+ MI->getOperand(1).getType()==MachineOperand::MO_VirtualRegister))||
+ (MI->getNumOperands() == 2 &&
+ (MI->getOperand(0).getType()==MachineOperand::MO_VirtualRegister)))
+ && MI->getOperand(MI->getNumOperands()-1).getType() ==
+ MachineOperand::MO_VirtualRegister &&
+ "Bad format for MRMDestReg!");
+
+ if (MI->getNumOperands() == 3 &&
+ MI->getOperand(0).getReg() != MI->getOperand(1).getReg())
+ O << "**";
+
+ O << "\t";
+ O << getName(MI->getOpCode()) << " ";
+ printOp(O, MI->getOperand(0), RI);
+ O << ", ";
+ printOp(O, MI->getOperand(MI->getNumOperands()-1), RI);
+ O << "\n";
+ return;
+ case X86II::MRMDestMem:
+ case X86II::MRMSrcReg:
+ case X86II::MRMSrcMem:
+ default:
+ O << "\t-"; MI->print(O, TM); break;
+ }
}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list