[llvm-bugs] [Bug 240049] `x.saturating_add(x)` gives better assembly than `x.saturating_mul(2)`

LLVM Bugs via llvm-bugs llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Sat Nov 7 14:12:53 PST 2026

Previous message: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 240048] [include-cleaner] Inherited member operators are attributed to the base class, so misc-include-cleaner disagrees between libstdc++ and libc++
Next message: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 240059] [clang-format] clang-format-diff.py formats nothing when +++ lines carry a timestamp
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20261107/19ec369e/attachment-0001.html>

Previous message: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 240048] [include-cleaner] Inherited member operators are attributed to the base class, so misc-include-cleaner disagrees between libstdc++ and libc++
Next message: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 240059] [clang-format] clang-format-diff.py formats nothing when +++ lines carry a timestamp
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-bugs mailing list