[llvm-bugs] [Bug 162356] [libc++] Investigate why fill and fill_n on vector<bool> are 73% faster in the unstable ABI

LLVM Bugs via llvm-bugs llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Tue Oct 7 12:49:54 PDT 2025

Previous message: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 162355] [libc++] Investigate why `std::vector<std::string>::operator=` is 50% slower with the stable ABI
Next message: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 162357] [libc++] Investigate why SetIntersection_Interlaced_Vector_tuple<uint32, _uint64, _uint32>_262144_262144 is orders of magnitude faster in the unstable ABI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20251007/c85d51c6/attachment.html>

Previous message: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 162355] [libc++] Investigate why `std::vector<std::string>::operator=` is 50% slower with the stable ABI
Next message: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 162357] [libc++] Investigate why SetIntersection_Interlaced_Vector_tuple<uint32, _uint64, _uint32>_262144_262144 is orders of magnitude faster in the unstable ABI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-bugs mailing list