[llvm-bugs] [Bug 86854] We could instead implement a custom type that calls the user-provided operation in its `operator+`, and then always call `operator+`. This would get rid of these macros and special casing for known operators.

LLVM Bugs via llvm-bugs llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Wed Mar 27 11:59:28 PDT 2024

Previous message: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 86849] Attributes on a function template definition (but not declaration) ignored if instantiation occurs before definition
Next message: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 86855] Anonymous struct construct causes a Clang front-end assertion.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20240327/3b49ca66/attachment.html>

Previous message: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 86849] Attributes on a function template definition (but not declaration) ignored if instantiation occurs before definition
Next message: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 86855] Anonymous struct construct causes a Clang front-end assertion.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-bugs mailing list