[llvm-bugs] [Bug 51280] New: Backport lldb AArch64 memory tagging commands changes to 13.x branch

[via llvm-bugs]

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51280

            Bug ID: 51280
           Summary: Backport lldb AArch64 memory tagging commands changes
                    to 13.x branch
           Product: lldb
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: release blocker
          Priority: P
         Component: All Bugs
          Assignee: lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
          Reporter: david.spickett at linaro.org
                CC: jdevlieghere at apple.com, llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org

Currently 13.x has a "memory tag read" command and half the supporting code for
"memory tag write". Backporting the following patches would complete the tag
write command, and the basic memory tagging feature set for lldb 13.

6a7a2ee8161da84d9a58a88b497b0b47c8df99f3 https://reviews.llvm.org/D105182 -
Memory tag write command
6eded00e0c6b4e06225df74292c078030556b8ce https://reviews.llvm.org/D105183 -
Memory tag write "--end-addr" option
d510b5f199d6e7a3062b5a6ea43181c4cc00a605 https://reviews.llvm.org/D105178 -
Annotate synchronous tag faults
555cd03193c9c098d787bec93eadfe43b179db9c https://reviews.llvm.org/D104914 -
Correct memtags packets type field format
98b5659b53ff93f3b68e48ea28ec54081196ae3b https://reviews.llvm.org/D106880 -
Mark mismatched tags in "memory tag read" output

Ok to cherry pick these to the branch?

Also I'd like to add these features to the lldb release notes. Can I do that
directly or should I put up a phabricator review for it first?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20210730/9bd547ad/attachment.html>