[llvm-bugs] [Bug 51277] New: [DWARF] DW_AT_alignment incorrect when attribute((__aligned__)) is present but ignored
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jul 29 16:09:58 PDT 2021
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51277
Bug ID: 51277
Summary: [DWARF] DW_AT_alignment incorrect when
attribute((__aligned__)) is present but ignored
Product: clang
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: C++
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: Wolfgang_Pieb at playstation.sony.com
CC: blitzrakete at gmail.com, dgregor at apple.com,
erik.pilkington at gmail.com, llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org,
richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
// Given the following source,
struct MyType { int m; } __attribute__((aligned(1)));
MyType mt;
when simply compiled with clang++ -c -g, produces a DW_TAG_structure_type DIE
for MyType, with DW_AT_alignment having a value of 1.
However, the actual alignment of the type is 4, since, according to the gcc
documentation, the alignment attribute, when used on structs, can only increase
alignment, and not decrease it (unless attribute "packed" is also specified).
clang does return the correct value from alignof(). See
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.2.0/gcc/Common-Type-Attributes.html#Common-Type-Attributes.
g++ generates a type DIE for MyType with DW_AT_alignment being 4.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20210729/c9fecb2e/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list