[llvm-bugs] [Bug 48872] New: Rejects-valid for overloaded hidden non-template friend functions with mutually exclusive requires-clauses
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 25 04:39:41 PST 2021
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48872
Bug ID: 48872
Summary: Rejects-valid for overloaded hidden non-template
friend functions with mutually exclusive
requires-clauses
Product: clang
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: C++2a
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: davveston at gmail.com
CC: blitzrakete at gmail.com, erik.pilkington at gmail.com,
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org, richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
As per [defns.signature.friend] in N4861, the signature of a non-template
friend function includes a trailing requires-clause, if it is present.
Moreover, [over.dcl]/1 states that two function declarations declare different
functions if they have different trailing requires-clauses.
The following example fails to compile for Clang (-std=c++2b, 12.0.0 trunk):
#include <iostream>
template<int N>
struct S {
friend void foo(int) requires (N == 1) { std::cout << "1\n"; }
friend void foo(int) requires (N == 2) { std::cout << "2\n"; }
operator int() const { return 0; }
};
int main() {
foo(S<1>{}); // 1
foo(S<2>{});
// error: definition with same mangled
// name '...' as another definition
}
which is arguably incorrect, as the two, separate (by separate
requires-clauses) friend declarations (that are also definitions) should not
generate the same mangled name.
---
(Constrained hidden non-template friends was added as per NS US115 of P2103R0;
http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2020/p2103r0.html)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20210125/c39f7ea8/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list