[llvm-bugs] [Bug 48175] New: missing "uninitialized variable" warning when using VLAs
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Fri Nov 13 12:05:54 PST 2020
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48175
Bug ID: 48175
Summary: missing "uninitialized variable" warning when using
VLAs
Product: clang
Version: 11.0
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: C
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: felix-llvm at fefe.de
CC: blitzrakete at gmail.com, dgregor at apple.com,
erik.pilkington at gmail.com, llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org,
richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
Here is some sample code:
int foo(int n) {
int foo[n];
return foo[0];
}
Cheeky clang generates only a ret for this function. That's it.
I expected a warning that I am reading an uninitialized value in the return
statement.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20201113/e24f20db/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list