[llvm-bugs] [Bug 45919] Different AST exposed for functions tagged with __stdcall.

[via llvm-bugs]

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45919

Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) <emilio at crisal.io> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #2 from Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) <emilio at crisal.io> ---
Yeah, so you're right it's exposed in libclang, under a CXCursor_TypeRef. It's
a bit fishy, but I guess I can recurse through those.

That being said, I found another case while testing this where libclang did not
expose the argument names at all with Objective-c, but arguably that's a much
different use-case.

Will close this, thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20200515/9eb21105/attachment.html>