[llvm-bugs] [Bug 45238] New: Could warn for more uses of null pointer
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Wed Mar 18 08:32:46 PDT 2020
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45238
Bug ID: 45238
Summary: Could warn for more uses of null pointer
Product: clang
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: Frontend
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: john.brawn at arm.com
CC: llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org, neeilans at live.com,
richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
For the following functions:
int fn1() {
int *var;
return *var;
}
int fn2() {
int *var = 0;
return *var;
}
int fn3() {
return *(int*)0;
}
With -Wall we give a warning for fn1 and fn3, but not fn2:
tmp.c:3:11: warning: variable 'var' is uninitialized when used here
[-Wuninitialized]
return *var;
^~~
tmp.c:2:11: note: initialize the variable 'var' to silence this warning
int *var;
^
= 0
tmp.c:10:10: warning: indirection of non-volatile null pointer will be deleted,
not trap [-Wnull-dereference]
return *(int*)0;
^~~~~~~~
tmp.c:10:10: note: consider using __builtin_trap() or qualifying pointer with
'volatile'
It looks like we should be able to warn for fn2 as well, given that we can warn
for use of var when it's uninitialized.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20200318/52e361f1/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list