[llvm-bugs] [Bug 45235] New: [llvm-readelf] - Relocation addends printed style does not match GNU readelf
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Wed Mar 18 04:30:06 PDT 2020
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45235
Bug ID: 45235
Summary: [llvm-readelf] - Relocation addends printed style does
not match GNU readelf
Product: tools
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: llvm-readobj
Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: grimar at accesssoftek.com
CC: jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk, llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
This is based on the test case from D75671.
Imagine we have an object with relocations:
(A piece of YAML)
Relocations:
## Addend == first negative int64 == -1.
- Addend: 0xffffffffffffffff
Type: R_X86_64_NONE
## Addend == min possible int64 == 0x8000000000000000.
- Addend: 0x8000000000000000
Type: R_X86_64_NONE
## Addend == an arbitrary negative number.
- Addend: 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFCFC7 ## -12345
Type: R_X86_64_NONE
Currently, we print:
Type Symbol's Value Symbol's Name + Addend
R_X86_64_NONE ffffffffffffffff{{$}}
R_X86_64_NONE 8000000000000000{{$}}
R_X86_64_NONE ffffffffffffcfc7{{$}}
But it does not match to the GNU readelf which prints addends differently:
Type Symbol's Value Symbol's Name + Addend
R_X86_64_NONE -1
R_X86_64_NONE -8000000000000000
R_X86_64_NONE -3039
Probably we want to be more compatible with GNU.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20200318/89380977/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list