[llvm-bugs] [Bug 46238] New: False negative analyse c++ code in asserts
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jun 7 21:58:21 PDT 2020
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46238
Bug ID: 46238
Summary: False negative analyse c++ code in asserts
Product: clang
Version: 10.0
Hardware: Macintosh
OS: MacOS X
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: C++
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: spider.ch at gmail.com
CC: blitzrakete at gmail.com, dgregor at apple.com,
erik.pilkington at gmail.com, llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org,
richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
Hello.
I found an issue with warnings and asserts.
Let's say we have code:
#include <cassert>
enum class State
{
A = 0,
B,
C,
D,
E,
F
};
void ProcessState(State s)
{
assert(s > State::A || s < State::E); // < No warning
(__builtin_expect(!(s > State::A || s < State::E), 0) ?
__assert_rtn(__func__, "main.cpp", 15, "s > State::A || s < State::E") :
(void)0); // < main.cpp:16:38: warning: overlapping comparisons always evaluate
to true [-Wtautological-overlap-compare]
if (s > State::A || s < State::E) // < main.cpp:17:22: warning:
overlapping comparisons always evaluate to true
[-Wtautological-overlap-compare]
void(0);
}
int main(int, char**)
{
ProcessState(State::B);
return 0;
}
And compile code with:
clang++ -std=c++17 -g -O1 -Wtautological-compare main.cpp -o test
There will be no warning on line 15, but there is a mistake. If we move code
from assert to if or change assert with preprocessed code (as in line 16) then
a warning appears.
This behavior was seen in clang 5.0(Maybe and earlier, but I didn't check) and
later.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20200608/ff16659e/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list