[llvm-bugs] [Bug 46818] [Reduce] basic block reduction assumes callinst

[via llvm-bugs]

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46818

Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Fixed By Commit(s)|                            |af1dd0b
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
           Assignee|unassignedbugs at nondot.org   |lebedev.ri at gmail.com
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #3 from Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> ---
Since we are already widely replacing with undef in llvm-reduce,
one more place doesn't seem like much, certainly better than crashing.
Again, i suspect there are more problems there. What about switch, etc?

> ...

Actually, i wonder if we should be producing `freeze undef`, 
that is also well defined as per langref, i believe.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20200725/f3074393/attachment.html>