[llvm-bugs] [Bug 44572] New: Should -Werror imply -Wl, --fatal-warnings?

via llvm-bugs llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 16 12:23:14 PST 2020


https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44572

            Bug ID: 44572
           Summary: Should -Werror imply -Wl,--fatal-warnings?
           Product: clang
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P
         Component: C
          Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
          Reporter: sbc at chromium.org
                CC: blitzrakete at gmail.com, dgregor at apple.com,
                    erik.pilkington at gmail.com, llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org,
                    richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk

But GNU ld and lld support --fatal-warnings.  Should the compiler driver add
this flag when `-Werror` is given?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20200116/749e7c89/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-bugs mailing list