[llvm-bugs] [Bug 44572] New: Should -Werror imply -Wl, --fatal-warnings?
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 16 12:23:14 PST 2020
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44572
Bug ID: 44572
Summary: Should -Werror imply -Wl,--fatal-warnings?
Product: clang
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: C
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: sbc at chromium.org
CC: blitzrakete at gmail.com, dgregor at apple.com,
erik.pilkington at gmail.com, llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org,
richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
But GNU ld and lld support --fatal-warnings. Should the compiler driver add
this flag when `-Werror` is given?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20200116/749e7c89/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list