[llvm-bugs] [Bug 47357] New: clang falls on a valid code with an error: 'no matching constructor for initialization'
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Sun Aug 30 06:55:34 PDT 2020
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47357
Bug ID: 47357
Summary: clang falls on a valid code with an error: 'no
matching constructor for initialization'
Product: clang
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: C++2a
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: tangyixuan at mail.dlut.edu.cn
CC: blitzrakete at gmail.com, erik.pilkington at gmail.com,
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org, richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
Clang++ rejects the following code, while g++ accepts.
$ cat s.cpp
struct A
{
int a;
};
void f()
{
auto y = new A(1);
}
$ clang -v
clang version 11.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git
ab4627364aefcaac751e757b721b7d07b48a545a)
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
$ g++ -c -std=c++2a s.cpp
success.
$ clang++ -c std=c++2a s.cpp
s.cpp:8:16: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'A'
auto y = new A(1);
^ ~
s.cpp:1:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not
viable: no known conversion from 'int' to 'const A' for 1st argument
struct A
^
s.cpp:1:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit move constructor) not
viable: no known conversion from 'int' to 'A' for 1st argument
struct A
^
s.cpp:1:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit default constructor) not
viable: requires 0 arguments, but 1 was provided
1 error generated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20200830/18aba050/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list