[llvm-bugs] [Bug 43417] New: After r357222, Assertion failed: (A->getParent() == B->getParent() && "Instructions must be in the same basic block!"), function dominates, file lib/Analysis/OrderedBasicBlock.cpp, line 68.
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Mon Sep 23 12:49:29 PDT 2019
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43417
Bug ID: 43417
Summary: After r357222, Assertion failed: (A->getParent() ==
B->getParent() && "Instructions must be in the same
basic block!"), function dominates, file
lib/Analysis/OrderedBasicBlock.cpp, line 68.
Product: new-bugs
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: new bugs
Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: dimitry at andric.com
CC: htmldeveloper at gmail.com, llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
As reported in https://bugs.freebsd.org/240765, compiling the commoncpp port
with clang 9.0.0 results in an assertion:
Assertion failed: (A->getParent() == B->getParent() && "Instructions must be in
the same basic block!"), function dominates, file
/lib/Analysis/OrderedBasicBlock.cpp, line 68.
#0 thr_kill () at thr_kill.S:3
#1 0x0000000804812934 in __raise (s=6) at /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/raise.c:52
#2 0x0000000804785d99 in abort () at /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/abort.c:67
#3 0x00000008048025c1 in __assert (func=<optimized out>, file=<optimized out>,
line=<optimized out>, failedexpr=<optimized out>) at
/usr/src/lib/libc/gen/assert.c:51
#4 0x0000000001d6e6d6 in llvm::OrderedBasicBlock::dominates(llvm::Instruction
const*, llvm::Instruction const*) ()
#5 0x0000000002649878 in eliminateDeadStores(llvm::BasicBlock&,
llvm::AAResults*, llvm::MemoryDependenceResults*, llvm::DominatorTree*,
llvm::TargetLibraryInfo const*) ()
#6 0x0000000002650445 in (anonymous
namespace)::DSELegacyPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) ()
#7 0x000000000231b673 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
()
#8 0x00000000020e1b95 in (anonymous
namespace)::CGPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) ()
#9 0x000000000231be62 in llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) ()
#10 0x0000000002a643d1 in clang::EmitBackendOutput(clang::DiagnosticsEngine&,
clang::HeaderSearchOptions const&, clang::CodeGenOptions const&,
clang::TargetOptions const&, clang::LangOptions const&, llvm::DataLayout
const&, llvm::Module*, clang::BackendAction,
std::__1::unique_ptr<llvm::raw_pwrite_stream,
std::__1::default_delete<llvm::raw_pwrite_stream> >) ()
#11 0x00000000030e6fed in
clang::BackendConsumer::HandleTranslationUnit(clang::ASTContext&) ()
#12 0x00000000038117e3 in clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) ()
#13 0x000000000304ab0a in clang::FrontendAction::Execute() ()
#14 0x0000000002fc85c1 in
clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) ()
#15 0x00000000030e0dde in
clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) ()
#16 0x000000000145c43d in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*,
void*) ()
#17 0x000000000145a0db in main ()
This regressed with https://reviews.llvm.org/rL357222 (Recommit "[DSE] Preserve
basic block ordering using OrderedBasicBlock"), which was a recommit of
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL357208 for bug 38829.
Minimized test case:
// clang -cc1 -triple x86_64-- -S -O1 -fexceptions in6addr-min.cpp
struct a {
int b[6];
};
extern "C" void *memcpy(void *, void *, long);
struct c {
a *d;
int e;
c();
};
c::c() : e() {
d = new a;
memcpy(&d, 0, sizeof(a));
}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20190923/5ae57160/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list